Drawing for JACK OF ALL CONNECTIONS

USPTO serial 75882448

JACK OF ALL CONNECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JACK OF ALL CONNECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multi-line, multi-extension, computer telephony system comprising an electronic switch-board with mobile telecommunications and fax scanning capabilitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 12, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jul 10, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 10, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 16, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Apr 16, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 16, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 8, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jul 7, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 11, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 15, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 6, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 6, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 6, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 7, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 7, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 19, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 5, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance