Drawing for JACK OF ALL CONNECTIONS

USPTO serial 75882448

JACK OF ALL CONNECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JACK OF ALL CONNECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multi-line, multi-extension, computer telephony system comprising an electronic switch-board with mobile telecommunications and fax scanning capabilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 16, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 16, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 8, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 6, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 19, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 5, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance