USPTO serial 75882448
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Centrepoint S/W Technologies Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9B9, CA
OTTAWA, ONTARIO K1Z 8P9, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multi-line, multi-extension, computer telephony system comprising an electronic switch-board with mobile telecommunications and fax scanning capabilities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |