Drawing for INTERCEPTOR

USPTO serial 75882507

INTERCEPTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERCEPTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Loren G. Helmreich

LOREN G HELMREICH BROWNING BUSHMAN5718 WESTHEIMER. STE 1800HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007GAS SAMPLlNG EQUIPMENT CONSISTING OF FLOW LINES AND VALVES FOR SELECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN A GAS SOURCE AND A SAMPLING BOTTLEACTIVEOct 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 28, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 14, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 28, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 28, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 15, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance