USPTO serial 75883051
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth Cerne
ELISABETH CERNE ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP1020 MARSH RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing voice mail services, electronic transmission of faxes and voice messages by a global computer network; electronic mail services; voice over Internet protocol services; web to telephone content exchange | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |