USPTO serial 75883305
BRET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2003
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
88250 Weingarten, DE
88250 Weingarten, DE
88250 Weingarten, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Greigg
RONALD E GREIGG1423 POWHATAN ST STE ONEALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pneumatic-hydraulic drives for machines; pneumatic-hydraulic drives for power operated hand tools; power operated machine tools, namely, joining machines for sheet material, namely, metals, plastics and other manufacturing sheet goods; metal punching machines; metal stamping machines; metal forming machines; metal pressing machines; power operated machines for clamping, positioning, holding, crimping, shearing, cuttings, stamping marking, bending, folding or welding sheet material; power-operated hand tools for metal fastening | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2001 |
| 008 | Manually-operated hand tools for working, forming and machining operations on sheet materials, namely, dies for machine tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOX Pressotechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TOX Pressotechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TOX Pressotechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named BRET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |