Drawing for IASIAWORKS

USPTO serial 75883643

IASIAWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IASIAWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carla B. Oakley

CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services in the fields of e-commerce and conducting business in different geographic markets; facilitating transactions and e-commerce via the global computer network; providing business information on a wide variety of business topics, namely, e-commerce, network design, internet security, information technology, bandwidth planning, business planning, resource tracking and asset managementACTIVE
038Electronic mail services; providing multi-user access to a global computer network; broadband and high-bandwidth communication services; providing on-line bulletin boards in the field of e-commerce and conducting business online; providing electronic data interchange servicesACTIVE
042Hosting, maintaining, and monitoring the web sites of others on a global computer network; providing data center services, network monitoring, load balancing and security solutions; providing language translation servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 16, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance