Drawing for ECOSTANDARD

USPTO serial 75883767

ECOSTANDARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOSTANDARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. MORLEY DRUCKER,

I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TOXIC WASTE MATERIALSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 21, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 29, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 16, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance