USPTO serial 75884451
BUBBY YA-YA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUBBY YA-YA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H2T2K4, CA
Montreal, Quebec H2T2K4, CA
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Zielinski
ROBERT F ZIELINSKI WOLF, BLOCK, SCHORR & SOLIS-COHEN LLP1650 ARCH ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls and plush toy characters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cymerman, Alana
- Other trademarks owned by Cymerman, Alana
- Other trademarks owned by Greer, Heather
- Other trademarks owned by Greer, Heather
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BUBBY YA-YA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |