USPTO serial 75884467
ULTIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R J HEHER
R J HEHER FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | live, telephone, television and on-line auction services; promotion of the goods and services of others in the fields of entertainment, sports, cultural and leisure activities; promotion of the goods and services of others through introductions to celebrities; and dissemination of advertising for others via on-line electronics communication networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | conducting travel tours | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | organizing and conducting various sporting, cultural and entertainment events, and live performances by musical and theatrical celebrities | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |