USPTO serial 75885492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Shaddock, II
PETER A SHADDOCK II KAUFMAN & SHADDOCK150 W MAIN ST STE 2100NORFOLK, VA 23510UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME DISCS; COMPUTER GAME JOYSTICKS; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME TAPES; AND INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; VIDEO GAME DISCS; VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE CONTROL FLOOR MATS; VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE REMOTE CONTROL UNITS; VIDEO GAME JOYSTICKS; VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; VIDEO GAME TAPE CASSETTES; AND VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE, PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING IMAGES AND INFORMATION OF INTEREST TO YOUNG GIRLS; VIDEO DISCS FEATURING IMAGES AND INFORMATION OF INTEREST TO YOUNG GIRLS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |