Drawing for EZ DEAL

USPTO serial 75885974

EZ DEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZ DEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Tanenbaum

WILLIAM A TANENBAUM KAYE. SCHOLER. FIERMAN. HAYS & HANDLER425 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-3598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing marketing information and ordering services in the field of electronic commerce via global computer networks; dissemination of advertising for others via on-line electronic communications network; providing information on global computer networks in the field of electronic commerce in the nature of prices, discounts, sales, availability, terms and other information relating to various third-party merchants and the goods and services offered by such merchants; enabling consumers to make purchases of goods and services from others on global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance