USPTO serial 75885985
TOOLS FOR WELLNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOOLS FOR WELLNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn A. Heiberg,
KATHRYN A HEIBERG ANIK AND HEIBERG LAW OFFICE5655 LINDERO CANYON RD STE 601WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric, optical, and apparatus for recording transmission and reproduction of sound and images, namely, air purifiers, water purifiers, water purifiers, ionization and ozanation devices, full spectrum lights, simulated sunrise lamps, brain tuner micro-current energy devices, EMF protection devices, biofeedback devices, float tanks, noise conditioners, magnets, remote viewing systems, lucid dreaming devices, exercise machines, Tesla watches, tetrahedron beamers, bioelectric shield devices, mindwave goggles, headphones, light and sound glasses and machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely books, brochures, and magazines in the field of physical and mental health and well being | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |