USPTO serial 75886044
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hales Corners, WI
Hales Corners, WI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Heino
JOSEPH S HEINO DAVIS & KUELTHAU, SC111 E KILBOURN, STE 1400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6613UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WATER SUPPLY ASSEMBLY USED WITH AUTOMATIC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS TO AID IN CONNECTING SPRINKLER HEADS TO WATER SUPPLY LINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |