USPTO serial 75886441
Serial No. 75886441
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75886441?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
69394 Lyon Cedex 03, FR
69394 Lyon Cedex 03, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON E. GRAY III
ALBIN H GESS ESQ SNELL & WILMER LLPSTE 12001920 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; MICRO-COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; NETWORKING, INTERNET AND DATA TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, NAMELY, ROUTERS, SWITCHES, HUBS, ADAPTERS, NETWORK INTERFACE ADAPTERS, CONVERTERS, TRANSCEIVERS, NETWORKING CABLES, PRINT SERVERS AND PCI CARDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING NETWORK HARDWARE PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |