USPTO serial 75886480
EDOLLARSBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDOLLARSBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory P. Gulia
GREGORY P GULIA DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial management, financial information provided by electronic means, insurance administration and financial services, namely, money lending | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |