Drawing for BIGPRIZES.COM

USPTO serial 75886509

BIGPRIZES.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIGPRIZES.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN M. SELNA

STEVEN M SELNA GORDON & REES, LLP275 BATTERY ST20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE CONDUCTING OF SWEEPSTAKES AND OTHER GAMES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 20, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2002EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Dec 13, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 22, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 22, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance