USPTO serial 75886535
LOGICOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOGICOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J Lynch,
JOHN J LYNCH27 UNION SQ W STE 503, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer software, programs, systems and networks for others and computer consultations; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail and in person | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |