USPTO serial 75886723
THE ART OF COMMUNICATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ART OF COMMUNICATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROCHELLE PARK, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M. FRIEDMAN
BILL POLKINGHORN - DISCOVERY DISPATCH DR MARK FRIEDMAN LTD9003 FLORIN WAYUPPER MARLBORO, MD 20772UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | VOICE AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, WHICH PROVIDE VOICE, DATA, FACSIMILE, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND FINANCIAL TRANSACTION COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH THE GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |