USPTO serial 75887214
JOOP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOOP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-20149 Hamburg, DE
D-20149 Hamburg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eye glasses; prerecorded sound recording carriers in the nature of audio tapes featuring music, music cassettes and compact discs featuring music | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Binders; photograph albums and picture albums; announcement cards, desktop stationery cabinets; framed and unframed pictures; bond paper; copy paper; pencils; pencil sharpeners; pencil sharpening machines; paper pads; paperweights; letter trays, bond paper containing letterheads; books and pamphlets featuring design, fashion, lifestyle, home decor, interior design; bookends; office supplies, namely, paper hole punches, staplers for paper, staple removers, letter racks, small trays for office supplies; penholders; fountain pens; greeting cards; envelopes; file folders; passport holders; hat boxes made of cardboard; calendars; coasters made of paper; playing cards; cardboard; lithographic works of art; bookmarks; magazines featuring design, fashion, lifestyles, home decor, interior design; paper cutters for office use; paper scrapers for office use; pencil leads and holders therefore; notebooks; wrapping paper; stationery; paper face towels; paper towels; paper table napkins; paper handkerchiefs, conical paper bags; blinds made of paper; photographic prints, photo engravings; paintbrushes; posters, portraits; postcards, prospectuses featuring design, fashion, lifestyle, home decor, interior design; rubber erasers; rosaries; boxes of cardboard or paper; signboards of paper or cardboard, patterns for dressmaking; pen cases; inkstands; writing instruments, namely, pencils, ballpoint pens, fountain pens, felt pens, crayons; writing or drawing books; portfolios for writing paper; writing paper; paper placemats; paper tablecloths; table linen of paper; paper table mats, packaging material made of paper or cardboard, namely, bags, boxes, cartons, drawing materials, namely, drawing paper and crayons; drawing pads; drawing boards; graphic prints; periodicals and newspapers featuring design, fashion, lifestyle, home decor, interior design; paper cigar bands | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Beds, library shelves; office furniture; coats stands, bins not made of metal; high chairs for babies, cushions; coat hangers; chests of drawers, easy chairs, air mattresses, not for medical purposes; mattresses; furniture ; storage racks and book racks; umbrella stands; sleeping bags for camping; jewelry cases, not made of precious metal; cupboards, desks; serving carts; armchairs; sofas; mirrors; chairs; tables, showcases; non-metal curtain rings; curtain rails; curtain rods; newspaper display stands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |