Drawing for SCIS MARKETFRESH FOODS

USPTO serial 75888468

SCIS MARKETFRESH FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SCIS MARKETFRESH FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bart A. Lazar

BART A LAZAR SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON55 E MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029PREPARED GARDEN SALADS AND VEGETABLE SALADS, CUT FRESH VEGETABLES; AND PREPARED AND PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLESABANDONED—
030SANDWICHES; PREPARED AND PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICEABANDONED—
042CATERING SERVICES; FOOD PREPARATION; CONTRACT FOOD SERVICES; NAMELY, PROVIDING FOODS FOR OTHERS TO BE SOLD BY THEM TO CONSUMERS AT SUPERMARKETS, CONVENIENCE STORES AND IN VENDING MACHINESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 16, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 12, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 31, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance