USPTO serial 75888960
SATIN FINISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SATIN FINISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S Berman
ROD S BERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BLEACHING PREPARATIONS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES FOR LAUNDRY USE, NAMELY, BLEACH, DETERGENT; CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HOUSEHOLD CLEANSERS; SOAPS, NAMELY, LAUNDRY SOAPS, BODY SOAPS, SOAPS FOR HOUSEHOLD CLEANING; PERFUMES; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; COSMETICS; NAMELY, MAKE-UP, LIPSTICK, EYELINER, ROUGE; HAIR, HAND, FACE, BODY, FOOT AND NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS AND PRODUCTS; NAMELY, SKIN, FACE AND BODY CREAMS, SOAPS, OILS, POWDERS, SCRUBS, MISTS, MOISTURIZERS AND LOTIONS, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND HAIR CONDITIONERS, BATH AND/OR SHOWER GELS AND NON-MEDICATED SALTS, BUBBLE BATH, EYE CREAM, SHAVING LOTIONS AND CREAMS, NAIL POLISH, SUN SCREEN, SUN BLOCK AND SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS; DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |