USPTO serial 75888973
CINEMATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINEMATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane E Turriff
DIANE E TURRIFF WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATIPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION, REVIEWS AND PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT VIA ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NetFlix.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NetFlix.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NETFLIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CINEMATCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |