Drawing for ENVIROSLATE

USPTO serial 75889665

ENVIROSLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3371118Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENVIROSLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Smith

Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019SIMULATED SLATE ROOF COVERINGSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Dec 28, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 28, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 9, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2007DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Dec 6, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 6, 2007D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 24, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 23, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 22, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 1, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 12, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance