USPTO serial 75889804
DISCOVERY JOURNAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISCOVERY JOURNAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned T. Himmelrich
NED T HIMMELRICH GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER &233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission, or reproduction of sound or images, namely, audio and video cassette recorders, record players, compact disc players, digital video disc players; blank magnetic data carriers, blank recording discs and blank recording tapes; and computer discs, pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, pre-recorded recording discs, pre-recorded audio cassettes, pre-recorded audio discs, pre-recorded video tapes, and pre-recorded video discs, all featuring inspirational, spirituality, personal development, self-fulfillment, self-help, self- analysis, heritage, ethnicity, cultural traditions and customs, women's studies, and motivational topics; computer hardware and peripherals, namely, computers, monitors, computer cables, joysticks, computer mice, keyboards and printers; and downloadable electronic publications in the nature of instructional and teaching materials, syndicated columns, magazines, newsletters, fiction books and non-fiction books, all featuring inspirational, spirituality, personal development, self-fulfillment, self- help, self-analysis, heritage, ethnicity, cultural traditions and customs, women's studies, and motivational topics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |