USPTO serial 75889948
BIOLITE DISPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOLITE DISPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara A. Larsen
BARBARA A LARSEN BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | vehicle navigation units; audio and video cassette players; audio and video cassette recorders; audio receivers; video receivers; compact disc players; compact disc players and recorders; digital video disc players; digital video disc recorders; computer monitors; video monitors; amplifiers; data processors; micro processors; satellite processors; signal processors; televisions; graphic equalizers; parametric equalizers | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |