USPTO serial 75890815
I-DRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-DRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY L MEOLA
ANTHONY L MEOLA HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW BOX 34WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound recording and reproducing equipment, namely, dictating and transcribing machines, voice telephone answering machines, data loggers in the nature of a unit that records data and events with respect to time, voice processors, words processors and text editing systems comprising external computer hard drives and memory cards, computer peripherals, sound recording media, namely, blank audio cassettes, blank audio tapes, blank audio cartridges, and blank vinyl records, and parts therefore namely, belts, foils, and filaments for transcription purposes, flash memory cards and flash memory discs and parts thereof for all the aforesaid goods; computer operating programs for use with dictating and transcribing machines for facilitating the exchange of voice, text, data and knowledge and which allows communications between computer memory modules, computer hardware and computer networks and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith for all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |