USPTO serial 75890929
SOFT TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFT TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Connors
JOHN J CONNORS CONNORS & ASSOCIATES1600 DOVE ST STE 220NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92662UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NAIL GROOMING PRODUCTS AND COSMETIC PRODUCTS NAMELY- fingernail tips, nail forms, finger nail wraps of silks, fiberglass and linen, nail glue, cuticle conditioner, eye shadow applicators and wedges, make up, system for forming artificial nails comprising primer, polymer, and liquid monomer, nail wrap system for forming artificial nails including gel, brush-on activator, nail tips and glue, top coat nail polish, cleansing creams and anti- microbial hand lotions, nail and brush wipe pads | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 1979 |
| 005 | DISINFECTANTS NAMELY-- antiseptic and anti-microbial cleaning solutions | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 1979 |
| 008 | MANICURE IMPLEMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 8, NAMELY-- nail files, cushioned nail files, emery boards, buffing implements and blocks, nail sanders, nail and cuticle scissors, cuticle pushers, finger and toe separators, pedicure files, scissors and wax boards | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2003 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |