USPTO serial 75891313
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hertfordshire, SG8 6EN, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colette A. Durst-Barker
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NETWORK APPLIANCE PRODUCTS FOR DATA MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, OPTICAL DISK DRIVES, JUKEBOXES AND REMOVABLE MEDIA, NAMELY, STORAGE UNITS FOR RECORDING DATA, NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY OPTICAL DISK DRIVES, JUKEBOXES AND REMOVABLE MEDIA, NAMELY, STORAGE UNITS FOR RECORDING DATA; FILE SYSTEMS, NAMELY NETWORK DATA STORAGE PLATFORMS; COMPUTER INTEGRATION SOFTWARE FOR DATA STORAGE | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1997 |
| 016 | MANUALS AND HANDBOOKS IN THE FIELD OF DATA STORAGE | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |