Drawing for ALLSTOR

USPTO serial 75891313

ALLSTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLSTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colette A. Durst-Barker

ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009NETWORK APPLIANCE PRODUCTS FOR DATA MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, OPTICAL DISK DRIVES, JUKEBOXES AND REMOVABLE MEDIA, NAMELY, STORAGE UNITS FOR RECORDING DATA, NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY OPTICAL DISK DRIVES, JUKEBOXES AND REMOVABLE MEDIA, NAMELY, STORAGE UNITS FOR RECORDING DATA; FILE SYSTEMS, NAMELY NETWORK DATA STORAGE PLATFORMS; COMPUTER INTEGRATION SOFTWARE FOR DATA STORAGEACTIVENov 30, 1997
016MANUALS AND HANDBOOKS IN THE FIELD OF DATA STORAGEACTIVENov 30, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 2, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance