USPTO serial 75892492
EDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERGTHE BAKER BLDG 6TH FL1940 E SIXTH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2294Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Office furniture, namely chairs and stools, restaurant furniture, namely chairs, stools and sofas, hospital furniture, namely chairs and stools, furniture for use in public institutions and public places and waiting rooms, namely chairs and stools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |