USPTO serial 75893030
POLYPROPYLENE TECHNOLOGY TARGOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYPROPYLENE TECHNOLOGY TARGOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline M. Ostroski
JACQUELINE M OSTROSKI BASF CORPORATION3000 CONTINENTAL DR NMOUNT OLIVE, NJ 07828-1234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, NAMELY, CRUDE PLASTICS IN THE FORM OF POWDERS, GRANULES, CHIPS, DISPERSIONS, LIQUIDS, OR PASTES FOR MANUFACTURING USE IN THE PLASTICS INDUSTRY; ARTIFICIAL RESINS AND SYNTHETIC RESINS IN THE CRUDE STATE FOR MANUFACTURING USE IN THE PLASTICS INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS FOR USE AS AUXILIARIES IN THE MANUFACTURE AND PROCESSING OF PLASTICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | SEMI-MANUFACTURED PLASTICS IN THE FORM OF BOARDS, TUBES, PROFILES, RODS, BLOCKS, SHEETING OR MOLDED ARTICLES FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SERVICES OF A CHEMIST, SERVICES OF A CHEMICAL ENGINEER, SERVICES OF A CHEMICAL LABORATORY; TECHNICAL ADVICE AND PROVISION OF EXPERT OPINIONS IN THE FIELD OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |