USPTO serial 75893578
PERFORMX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Brunet
WILLIAM J BRUNET FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |