USPTO serial 75893985
MEXICO EN LINEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXICO EN LINEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AGENCIES; PROMOTIONAL MARKETING TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS; TELEPHONE DIRECTORY INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, INTERNET CONNECTIONS, LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES, AND LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY ACCESS CODE, COMPUTER TERMINALS, TELEPHONE, TELEVISIONS, RADIO, AND TELEPRINTER, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND CODED IMAGES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGE AND DATA; WIRELESS DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC STORE-AND-FORWARD MESSAGING; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO THE INTERNET; FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |