USPTO serial 75894121
SONIC INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONIC INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Peterborough, Ontario, CA
SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
Peterborough, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS MILLTRONICS PROCESS INSTRUMENTS INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kim Brule
KIM BRULE C/O RIDOUT & MAYBEESTE 2400 ONE QUEEN ST ETORONTO, ON M5C 3B1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE USED IN LEVEL MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, AND ADVANCED ECHO-PROCESSING SOFTWARE WHICH DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN REAL ECHOES AND FALSE ECHOES REFLECTED FROM OBSTRUCTIONS OR RESULTING FROM ACOUSTICAL OR ELECTRICAL NOISE, FUNCTIONING TO CAPTURE WEAK AND TRUE ECHOES IN DIFFICULT ENVIRONMENTS | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |