USPTO serial 75894192
MERCURY DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2001
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MERCURY DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Florists Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by Florists Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Florists Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by Florists Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Florists? Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by Florists? Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
Scott J. Major Millen White Zelano & Branigan, PC2200 Clarendon Blvd., 14th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES IN THE NATURE OF FLORAL AND GIFT ORDERS WORLDWIDE BETWEEN RETAIL BUSINESSES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jan 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Florists Transworld Delivery, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Florists Transworld Delivery, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FTD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Florists? Transworld Delivery, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MERCURY DIRECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |