Drawing for BRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75894396

BRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GAIL TULER FRIEDMAN

GAIL TULER FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN, LTDMONADNOCK BLDG STE 163353 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60604-3606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, NAMELY ADVISING MANAGEMENT ON HOW TO BUILD AND MANAGE A COMPANY'S BRAND AND/OR PORTFOLIO OF BRANDS TO DRIVE LONG-TERM PROFITABILITY AND INCREASE SHAREHOLDER WORTHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance