Drawing for MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 75894431

MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dyann L. Kostello

DYANN L KOSTELLO MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of employment lawACTIVEMar 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 31, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 4, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 11, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance