USPTO serial 75895590
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dania Beach, FL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computer services; Computer sales services provided by means of a global computer network; computerized searching, ordering and on-line retail and wholesale electronic transmission of sound, music, video. distributorship services featuring Computer maintenance Electronic distribution and information management. general merchandise and general consumer goods; providing access to on-line directories, indices and searchable databases relating to a variety of information and data available on a global computer network; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; providing an on-line searchable database for the sale of goods and services of others; providing an on-line searchable ordering guide for locating, organizing and presenting goods and services of other on-line vendors; database aggregation, integration and management services; Association services, namely providing opportunities for exchange of information and conversation regarding a wide variety of topics by means of live automated file transfer, events, mailed information, product reviews and interaction on a global computer network; providing an interactive computer database featuring automatically and semiautomatically updating software, personal planner, date reminder, travel planner, sound video and alumni and professional group links, via a global computer network; providing on-line interactive computer software for managing, viewing and editing information such as service updates event scheduling, address books, and other personal and professional contact information; computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to computer networks for the electronic transmission of various data, communications, documents and personal and professional information; searching and retrieving information, sites, and resources located on computer networks for others; providing a wide range of general interest information via a computer network; directory services to help locate people, places, organizations, phone numbers, music network home pages, and electronic mail addresses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |