USPTO serial 75895615
EON COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EON COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micheline Kelly Johnson
VALERIE WALSH JOHNSON ESQ BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL ET AL165 MADISON AVE STE 2000MEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications servers and software for the management, integration and delivery of voice, e-mail, global computer networks, fax and multi-media communications; contact center systems comprised of automatic call distributors (ACD), which consist of switching hardware that distribute incoming calls to available modems, private communications exchanges (PCX), which are IP-based systems that bring together an organization's networking and information technology systems with the global computer network and align voice communications with computer applications, private branch exchanges (PBX), which are private telephone networks used within an enterprise, routing and response management equipment and telecommunications computer hardware and software for the management, integration and delivery of voice, e-mail, global computer networks, fax and multi-media communications; computer programs and software to operate and monitor telecommunications systems, namely switches, telephones, cellular phones, pagers and handheld personal computers; and voice processing and messaging systems comprising computer hardware and software for implementing voice, e-mail, fax and multi-media communications messaging, distribution and management | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 1999 |
| 042 | Design, development, and technical servicing of communications servers and software for the management, integration and delivery of voice, e-mail, global computer networks, fax and multi-media communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |