Drawing for LITE F/X ATTITUDE LIGHTING

USPTO serial 75895674

LITE F/X ATTITUDE LIGHTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITE F/X ATTITUDE LIGHTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. Kole

JAMES D KOLE NIXON PEABODY LLPCLINTON SQ POST OFFICE BOX 1051ROCHESTER, NY 14603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011incandescent electric light bulbs, and electric lighting fixtures therefor; fluorescent electric light bulbs, and electric lighting fixtures therefor; novelty electric light bulbs, namely, black light bulbs and transparent colored bulbs, and electric lighting fixtures and bases therefor; black light fluorescent lighting tubes, and electric lighting fixtures therefor; novelty electric lamps and lights, namely, strobe lights, rotating globe-shaped lamps with multicolored light, revolving dome lights, and table lamps; laser light projectors; and fog machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 19, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 17, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 5, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance