USPTO serial 75895723
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIN M. FALK
ERIN M FALK SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALPO BOX 061080WACKER DR STA SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line magazines, newsletters, directories and books in the field of music, entertainment, arts and culture, videos, motion pictures, film, radio, television, news, current events, health and lifestyles, and sporting events; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network in the field of music, entertainment, arts and culture, videos, motion pictures, film, radio, television, news, current events, health and lifestyles, and sporting events; providing on-line computerized databases in the field of news, current events, health, lifestyles, arts and culture | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |