USPTO serial 75895964
QUESCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUESCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
78140 Velizy Villacoublay, FR
78140 Velizy Villacoublay, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A Cohen
DAVID A COHEN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EMBEDDED COMPUTERS; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, BLANK RECORDING DISCS FOR COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY DATA PROCESSING COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, UPDATE AND USE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF SOUNDS, IMAGES AND INFORMATION ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO AN ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO A COMPUTER NETWORK OR FOR TRANSMITTING DATA TO A WORLDWIDE NETWORK OR INTERNET AND TO PRIVATE ACCESS OR RESERVED COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND INTRANETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY TELECOMMUNICATION GATEWAY SERVICES, TELEPHONY SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE TRANSMISSION SERVICES BY MEANS OF COMPUTERS CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET; PAGING SERVICES, ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS AND PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSMISSION OF SOUND, IMAGES AND INFORMATION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |