USPTO serial 75895971
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Lubricants for Marine commercial and industrial applications, namely non-toxic biodegradable hydraulic fluids | ABANDONED | Sep 13, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |