Drawing for INNITRI

USPTO serial 75895993

INNITRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INNITRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Dubno

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011WASTE WATER PURIFICATION AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLANTS; WATER TREATMENT UNITS, NAMELY, FILTERS, REACTORS, DIGESTERS, DISINFECTORS, SEDIMENTORS, GASIFICATION UNITS AND NITRIFICATION REACTORSACTIVEJan 27, 2003
042DESIGN AND ENGINEERING OF WASTE WATER PURIFICATION AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLANTS AND PARTS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PLANTS, NAMELY NITRIFICATION UNITSACTIVEJan 27, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 25, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 25, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 26, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance