USPTO serial 75896039
SIGNTELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGNTELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS, LAPTOP COMPUTERS, HAND-HELD COMPUTERS, AND SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERS FOR ALLOWING DEAF PEOPLE AND HEARING IMPAIRED PEOPLE TO READ BOOKS IN SIGN LANGUAGE; COMPUTERS, LAPTOP COMPUTERS, HAND-HELD COMPUTERS, AND SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING DEAF AND HEARING IMPAIRED PEOPLE TO VIEW ORAL PRESENTATIONS AND ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IN SIGN LANGUAGE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY BOOK READING SERVICES WHICH ALLOW DEAF IMPAIRED PEOPLE TO READ BOOKS IN SIGN LANGUAGE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING SERVES TO ENABLE DEAF AND HEARING IMPAIRED PEOPLE TO VIEW ORAL PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS AND READ TEXT MATERIAL COMMUNICATIONS OVER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, IN SIGN LANGUAGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |