CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for I TIRE

USPTO serial 75896145

I TIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I TIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Garon

JOSEPH D GARON BAKER & BOTTS, LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Collection of mechanical and electronic components, namely, sensors in the chassis systems, radio transmitters, radio receivers; computer software to send and receive information from vehicle sensors, computer software that processes data received from sensors and generates information for action on vehicle dynamic management, stability and safety, and visual display for sending information to driver all for allowing measurement and analysis of tires, chassis systems parameters and for correction of chassis system parameters and other vehicle control systemsACTIVE—
012Tires equipped with sensors to detect tire characteristics and condition, tires, inner tubes for vehicle tires, tire treads; chassis systems for vehicles and their components, namely, axles, suspension systems for automobiles, hub caps, wheel covers for vehicles, front and rear springs, shock absorbers, elastic bushings for motor vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 15, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 30, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance