USPTO serial 75896168
ASK DR. SEARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASK DR. SEARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Capistrano Beach, CA
Capistrano Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter G. Maxwell
WALTER G MAXWELL CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING INTERACTIVE ONLINE SERVICES, NAMELY, MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ADVICE SERVICES RELATED TO INFORMATION ON PARENTING AND PEDIATRICS, CHILDCARE, CHILD DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH AND EDUCATION; AND PROVIDING AN ONLINE RESOURCE SITE ON PARENTING INFORMATION, INCLUDING CONTENTS OF PUBLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF PARENTING AND PEDIATRICS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |