USPTO serial 75896325
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. W. BREINER
A W BREINER115 N HENRY STPOST OFFICE BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |