USPTO serial 75896332
QUEEN OF SHAVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUEEN OF SHAVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SHAVING SOAPS; SHAVING STONES; AFTER-SHAVE PREPARATIONS; SHAVING OIL; SHAVING GEL; SHAVING FOAM; SKIN CLEANSERS AND MOISTURIZERS; NON-MEDICATED HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, HAIR DYE, SETTING AND STYLING LOTIONS FOR THE HAIR; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, BODY AND FACIAL SOAPS, DEODORANTS AND EXFOLIATORS FOR THE SKIN; PERFUMERY, NAMELY, EAU DE TOILETTE AND EAU DE PARFUMS; AND DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Knowledge & Merchandising, Inc. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Knowledge & Merchandising, Inc. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named QUEEN OF SHAVES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |