Drawing for CHOCOLATES A LA CARTE

USPTO serial 75896365

CHOCOLATES A LA CARTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2598689Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 23, 2002
Examiner
CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOCOLATES A LA CARTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan S. Pinlk

CFP CHOCOLATE HOLDINGS LLC3530 WILSHIRE BLVDSUITE 1610LOS ANGELES, CA 90010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030chocolate and desserts, namely, bakery goods, pastries and frozen confectionsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
042catering services featuring custom designed dessertsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2015ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 16, 2015C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jan 16, 2015CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 30, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 17, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 13, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 13, 2014C18PCANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL—
Aug 13, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 5, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 5, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 2, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 29, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 12, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 7, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 3, 2007815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 15, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 26, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance