USPTO serial 75896373
WOMEN'S UNITED SOCCER ASSOCIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOMEN'S UNITED SOCCER ASSOCIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WOMENS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, L.L.C.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by WOMENS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, L.L.C.
WOMENS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, L.L.C.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by WOMENS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, L.L.C.
WOMEN'S UNITED SOCCER ASSOCIATION PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Other trademarks owned by WOMEN'S UNITED SOCCER ASSOCIATION PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EMILY J. BARNHART
EMILY J BARNHART BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF A SOCCER LEAGUE; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROFESSIONAL SOCCER EXHIBITIONS AND GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WOMENS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by WOMENS PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by WOMEN'S UNITED SOCCER ASSOCIATION PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WOMEN'S UNITED SOCCER ASSOCIATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |