Drawing for CONGA ROOM RECORDS

USPTO serial 75896448

CONGA ROOM RECORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONGA ROOM RECORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dax Alvarez

DAX ALVAREZ BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVDSEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1026

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS AND TELEVISION SHOWS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY PRODUCTION OF MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS, NAMELY, PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, AUDIO MAGNETIC TAPES, COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL AUDIO TAPES, COMPACT DISC VIDEOS AND LASER DISCS; SHEET MUSIC PUBLICATION SERVICES; MUSIC PUBLISHING SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING MUSICAL ARTISTS AND PROVIDING RECORDED PERFORMANCES BY MUSICAL ARTISTS BY MEANS OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, A CONTINUING MUSIC AND VARIETY SHOW BROADCASTED OVER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, CABLE AND TELEVISION; PROVIDING A WEBSITE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 19, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 21, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance